Vector addition and subtraction: component and parallelogram methods
August 21, 2011 Leave a comment
by Quirino Sugon Jr.
Suppose we choose two points on the Cartesian coordinate system: and
. If we interpret these points as tips of the rays–which we shall now call as vectors–drawn from the origin at $(0,0)$, then we write down our vectors as
The sum and difference of these two vectors is given by
The parenthesis-and-comma notation for vectors is not amenable to algebraic manipulation. To solve this problem, we introduce two unit vectors (vectors of unit length) and
. The unit vector
points in the direction of positive
axis, while
points in the direction of positive
axis. Using these two unit vectors, let us rewrite Eqs. (1a) and (1b) as
Hence,
It feels natural, doesn’t it? You add only like terms: those with are added to those with
; those with
are added to those with
. If you have a bag containing 3 apples and 4 oranges and another bag containing 6 apples, then putting all these in a single bag results to 9 apples and 4 oranges. This is an interpretation of
. What do you think is the corresponding interpretation for
?
The apples-and-oranges interpretation, though helpful, is not really precise. The proper interpretation is geometrical. In order to interpret and
geometrically, we need to draw them together with
and
(see Fig. 1). Notice that if we construct a parallelogram with
as two of the parallel sides and
as the other two parallel sides, then
corresponds to one diagonal and
corresponds to the other diagonal.
Let us write down some rules. To draw , connect the tail of
to the tip of
, then draw
as the vector from the tail of vector
to the tip of
. On the other hand, to draw
, connect the tails of vectors
and
, then draw
as the vector from the tip of
to the tip of
.
In general, we can let the coefficients of and
to be any scalar, and we can even include a new unit vector
along the positive
axis. If we do this, then
so that
Equations (6a) and (6b) are the algebraic rules for vector addition and subtraction in three dimensions. The geometrical interpretation is still the same as that for two dimensions.




Recent Comments